Free art, was copyright
It is compulsory for an urban blog to post graffitti, isn't it? Here is my offering, part of a diptych, that you will find in Redchurch Street, Shoreditch (the other one is on My Other Stuff). I rather liked the humour.
posted by Ham at 00:02 --
Comments here: 7
Comments on "Free art, was copyright"
-
Anne said ... (01:02) :
-
mea said ... (03:18) :
-
Minor Fast Days said ... (03:20) :
-
nebel said ... (09:41) :
-
BondBloke said ... (15:36) :
-
BondBloke said ... (15:37) :
-
San Francisco Daily Photo said ... (01:23) :
post a commentOooh I love this :)
Yeah for good graffitti! Someone wrote graffitti on a large garage in my alley and it is terribly ugly. If you're going to deface something, at least do it well!
Melbourne is the grafitti capital of the world. Check out this site.
www.melbournegraffiti.com/
I love that! There is so much beautiful art everywhere!
Good graffitti is art, but there is so much crap graffitti out there which is just ugly - I agree with mea if you are going to deface something gve it some thought and do it properly...
BTW: Great blog!
Ham, I agree, graffiti is compulsory. And this one is great!
Manuel